cruise ship

An artist’s rendering from 2014 shows the proposed Long Bay Landing cruise pier. On March 11, 2015, the West Indian Co. Ltd. announced its board has suspended plans for the project in St. Thomas Harbor. On May 28, board members voted to approve the concept in executive session.

Do we, the residents of St. Thomas, want to live in a bus stop?

That is what we are doing to ourselves with the over-emphasis on this long broken cruise ship tourism model (“Cruise ship mega-project gets second life,” The Daily News, May 29.)

The time when cruise ships brought a few affluent passengers who stayed for days and spent their money on the island is long past. Now the cruise ship industry very efficiently manages to keep the revenue generated from their operations for themselves while inundating the island with tens of thousands of tourists for a blitz lasting only hours.

Today’s cruise ship arrivals are slam-bam-thank-you visits to a destination inadequately prepared to handle the traffic we already have. It is hit, dump, and run. Cruise ship operators assure their passengers that their on-board duty free stores are better. All-inclusive packages lure the passengers back to the ship for lunch. The ship provides the entertainment. No overnight stays in our hotels. No one is here long enough to get a feeling for what is wonderful about our home. Their experience often begins with the views of “scenic Sub Base,” then off to the Main Street construction site. They even grab a portion of the revenue from the tours our vendors provide.

Why are we being asked to pay for this new “mega-project” when we are doing such a poor job with what we already have?

Our government has proposed to build an amphitheater to compete with those on the largest cruise ships! At a time when Broadway talent has migrated to the cruise ships, our government is ready to gamble our tax dollars on its ability to compete with the best in the world? You can already see how competitive we are by visiting Crown Bay Center.

People who do bring money to the island are those who stay overnight. They patronize our hotels, villas, bars, restaurants and stores of every variety. Those who come on yachts freely spend incredible sums in all of these categories, plus many others. Visiting yachts will be largely displaced by this project. Their presence costs us nothing. They are a gift from our wonderful harbor; a harbor destined to be destroyed by this mega-mistake.

I suggest that the real cost of this project be put to our voters in a referendum. Our government’s public debt, plus the pension fund liability, is $60,000 for every man, woman and child on the island, a debt load that wildly exceeds that of our bankrupted neighbor, Puerto Rico.

As heads of households, what is our share of that debt? We know that borrowed money is not free. Why do we continue to allow our government to float bonds for huge projects with explosive pricetags when government retirees, tax refunds, potholes, garbage collection and the government’s WAPA bill wait?

Meanwhile, the Hugo-destroyed (1988) Federal Aviation Administration housing, and the Marilyn-destroyed (1995) school lunch buildings greet cruise ship visitors like cherished relics.

Curb appeal?

— Warren Stryker lives on St. Thomas.